Maintenance Log Completeness
A signed, dated maintenance log for each major piece of equipment — recording every service, oil change, filter replacement, bearing change and calibration — is the primary evidence of systematic maintenance.
In every P&M valuation context — bank SARFAESI, IBC CIRP, pre-sale and insurance — the Government Approved P&M Valuer’s physical condition assessment is the foundation of the depreciation rate and the certified value.
That assessment is directly affected by the quality of your preventive maintenance programme. A well-maintained factory can produce a P&M certificate that is 20–40% higher in collateral value than an identically-aged, identically-specified factory with deferred maintenance.
Maintenance evidence directly influences the valuer’s assessment of condition, depreciation and remaining useful life.
Maintenance records are not simply administrative documents. They provide evidence that helps establish the actual condition and expected remaining life of major plant and machinery assets.
A signed, dated maintenance log for each major piece of equipment — recording every service, oil change, filter replacement, bearing change and calibration — is the primary evidence of systematic maintenance.
Is maintenance performed at the manufacturer’s recommended intervals? A machine serviced at OEM-specified intervals — rather than only when it breaks down — demonstrates managed lifecycle management.
If a machine has 8 years of single-shift operation on record, its wear surfaces should look consistent with that utilisation.
If the physical wear suggests triple-shift operation, the utilisation record may be understating actual hours and the valuer may adjust the RUL estimate downward.
A CNC machine whose control system was upgraded from a 2008 Fanuc controller to a current-generation controller in 2023 has received significant capital investment.
Consider two identical 12-year-old hydraulic presses, manufactured by the same OEM in the same year. The difference in their assessed condition produces a substantial difference in their estimated Remaining Useful Life (RUL) and resulting DRC value.
Based on 12 years elapsed on a 25-year TEL, the Civil Engineer’s assessment gives this press a substantially longer remaining useful life.
The observed condition and absence of maintenance evidence result in a materially shorter estimated remaining useful life.
The difference between the two DRC assessments is driven by the documented and observed maintenance quality and physical condition.
Preventive maintenance is not only an operational discipline. In a professional plant and machinery valuation, the records, physical condition and capital improvements together provide evidence for assessing depreciation, remaining useful life and DRC.
Keeping equipment properly maintained and maintaining complete supporting records can therefore make a material difference when your machinery is being considered for bank collateral, SARFAESI, IBC CIRP, business sale or insurance valuation.